Where database blog posts get flame-broiled to perfection
Well, isn't this just a delightful find in my morning reading. "Build a ChatGPT app that connects to your Supabase database." How wonderful. I was just thinking that what our company truly needs is another project for the engineering department to call "mission-critical R&D" while my capital expenditure budget quietly bleeds out in a back alley. Let's translate this from 'aspirational tech blog' into 'line item on my Q3 budget forecast,' shall we?
"Connects to your Supabase database." Ah, Supabase. The "open-source Firebase alternative." Thatâs vendor-speak for, "The first hit is free, kid." Itâs the free puppy of databases. Looks adorable, wags its tail, and seems like a fantastic, low-cost addition to the family. Then you get the bill for the food, the vet visits, the emergency surgery after it eats a sock, and the professional trainer you have to hire because it chewed through the drywall. They lure you in with a generous "free tier" thatâs perfect for a weekend project, and the second you start serving actual traffic, the pricing tiers start looking like the altitude markers on a Mount Everest expedition.
And what are we using to build this marvel? "mcp-use" and "Edge Functions." My goodness, the jargon alone makes my wallet clench. "Edge Functions" is just a charming little euphemism for "death by a thousand financial cuts." You only pay for what you use! they chirp. Yes, and every single one of our ten thousand users clicking a button a few times a day will trigger one of these "functions," and suddenly I'm looking at a bill that has more zeroes than our CEO's bonus check. It's a pricing model designed by someone who clearly gets a commission.
But let's not get ahead of ourselves. Let's calculate the True Cost of Ownershipâą on this little adventure, because I can guarantee you it's not on their pricing page.
Letâs do some simple, back-of-the-napkin math, shall we?
So, for the low, low price of an article scroll, our "free" ChatGPT-powered widget has a first-year TCO of roughly $100,000 and a three-year cost spiraling towards a quarter of a million dollars.
And the promised ROI? The grand prize at the bottom of this financial Cracker Jack box?
Create interactive widgets for schema exploration, data viewing, and SQL queries.
We are spending a quarter of a million dollars to build a custom, bug-ridden, and unmaintainable version of DBeaver. We are setting a mountain of cash on fire to provide "interactive widgets" that save an engineer, maybe, five minutes a day. That's an ROI so deeply negative it's approaching absolute zero. This isnât a technology stack; itâs a financial black hole dressed up in a hoodie.
So, thank you, author, for this insightful post. Youâve given me a valuable lesson and the perfect slide for my next "Why We Can't Have Nice Things" presentation to the board. I will now go back to my spreadsheets, where the numbers are honest, even if they are horrifying.
And I can cheerfully promise I will never be reading this blog again. I'm having IT block the domain. It's cheaper.