🔥 The DB Grill 🔥

Where database blog posts get flame-broiled to perfection

Elastic Cloud Serverless on Google Cloud doubles region availability
Originally from elastic.co/blog/feed
September 19, 2025 • Roasted by Patricia "Penny Pincher" Goldman Read Original Article

(Patricia Goldman adjusts her glasses, stares at her monitor with disdain, and scoffs. She leans back in her ergonomic-but-on-sale chair and begins to dictate a memo to no one in particular.)

Oh, fantastic. "Elastic Cloud Serverless on Google Cloud doubles region availability." I can barely contain my excitement. Truly, my heart flutters at the thought of having twice as many geographical locations from which to hemorrhage cash. What this headline actually says is, "We've found new and exciting places on the map to build our money-bonfires."

Let's unpack this little gem, shall we? They love the word "serverless." It sounds so clean, so modern. Like we've transcended the mortal coil of physical hardware. What it really means is "billing-full." You don't see the server, so you can’t see the meter spinning at the speed of light until the invoice arrives. An invoice, I might add, that will be so long and complex it’ll make our tax filings look like a children's book. They promise you'll only pay for what you use. They just neglect to mention that you'll be using a thousand micro-services you never knew existed, each charging you a fraction of a penny a million times a second.

And the "synergy" of Elastic on Google Cloud? That’s not synergy. That’s a hostage situation with two captors. We’re not just buying into Elastic’s proprietary ecosystem; we’re bolting it onto Google’s. Trying to leave would be like trying to un-bake a cake. They know it. We know it. And the price reflects that beautiful, inescapable vendor lock-in.

Our sales rep, Chad—bless his heart—will come in here with a PowerPoint full of hockey-stick graphs and talk about "Total Cost of Ownership." He will conveniently forget a few line items. Let me just do some quick math on the back of this past-due invoice… let’s call it the Actual Cost of Ownership.

So, Chad’s $250,000 "investment" is actually a $775,000 first-year cash-incineration event. And that’s before we even talk about data egress fees, which are Google's way of charging you a cover fee, a two-drink minimum, and an exit fee for the privilege of visiting their club.

They’ll present a slide that says something absurd like:

"Customers see a 450% ROI by unlocking data-driven insights and accelerating time-to-market!"

My math shows that if this platform saves us, say, $150,000 in "operational efficiencies," our first-year ROI is a staggering negative 81%. We would get a better return on investment by loading the cash into a T-shirt cannon and firing it into a crowd. At least that would be good PR.

So they've doubled the region availability. Who cares? It's like a car salesman proudly announcing that the lemon he's selling you is now available in sixteen shades of bankrupt-beige. It doesn't change the fact that the engine is made of empty promises and the wheels are going to fall off the second you drive it off the lot.

So, no. We will not be "leveraging next-generation serverless architecture to innovate at scale." We will be keeping our money. Send their sales team a muffin basket and a thank-you note. Tell them we’ve decided to invest in something with a clearer, more predictable ROI: a very large whiteboard and several boxes of sharpened pencils.