Where database blog posts get flame-broiled to perfection
Well, look at this. Another dispatch from the front lines of… innovation. A veritable novel of a blog post, so rich with detail it leaves you breathless. My favorite part is the high-stakes drama, the nail-biting tension, of recommending 9.1.1 over 9.1.0. You can just feel the synergy in that sentence.
I remember sitting in those release planning meetings. A VP, who hadn't written a line of code since Perl 4, would stand in front of a slide deck full of rocket ships and hockey-stick graphs, talking about "delivering value" and "disrupting the ecosystem." Meanwhile, the senior engineers in the back are passing notes, betting on which core feature will be the first to fall over.
When you see a blog post this short, this… curt, it's not a sign of quiet confidence. It’s a sign of a five-alarm fire that they just managed to put out with a bucket of lukewarm coffee and a hastily merged pull request.
We recommend 9.1.1 over the previous versions 9.1.0
Let me translate this for you from Corporate Speak into plain English: "Version 9.1.0, which we proudly announced about twelve hours ago, has a fun little bug. It might be a memory leak that eats your server whole. It might be a query planner that decides the fastest way to find your data is to delete it. It might just turn your logs into ancient Sumerian poetry. Who knows! We sure didn't until our biggest customer's dashboard started screaming. Whatever you do, don't touch 9.1.0. We're pretending it never existed."
This is the glorious result of what they call "agile development" and what we called "shipping the roadmap." The roadmap, of course, being a fantasy document handed down from on high, completely disconnected from engineering reality. You get things like:
// TODO: make this thread-safe later from three years ago.And the best part? "For details of the issues... please refer to the release notes." Ah, the release notes. That sacred scroll where sins are buried. You won't find an entry that says, "We broke the entire authentication system because marketing promised a new login screen by Q3." No. You'll find a sterile, passive-aggressive little gem like:
"Addresses an issue where under certain conditions, user sessions could become invalid."
Under certain conditions. You know, conditions like "a user trying to log in."
So, by all means, upgrade to 9.1.1. Be a part of the magic. They fixed it! It's stable now! Just... don't be surprised when 9.1.2 comes out tomorrow to fix the bug they introduced while fixing the bug in 9.1.1. It's the circle of life.