Where database blog posts get flame-broiled to perfection
Alright, let's see what the marketing department has forwarded me this time. [Adjusts glasses, squints at the screen] "MongoDB is among the winners of the annual Glassdoor list of Best-Led Companies." Oh, how wonderful. I'm sure that award will look lovely framed on the wall of the bankruptcy court after we sign their contract. Iâm thrilled their employees feel so inspired and trusted every day. Of course they do. Theyâre not the ones staring down a seven-figure invoice that has more mysterious line items than my teenage sonâs credit card statement.
But let's put down the champagne for their "external badge of honor" and pick up the calculator, shall we? Because Iâm reading about their new "feature-rich" MongoDB 8.2 and this "Application Modernization Platform," and my ulcers are already doing the cha-cha. In my world, "feature-rich" means "requires a team of six-figure specialists to operate," and "Application Modernization Platform" is just a fancy, five-syllable way of saying vendor lock-in. It's not a platform; it's a gilded cage. You check in, but you can never leave. Not without a "migration fee" that costs more than the GDP of a small island nation.
Theyâre very proud to serve nearly 60,000 organizations. I see that as 60,000 finance departments whoâve been hypnotized by buzzwords like "state-of-the-art accuracy" and "trustworthy, reliable AI applications." Letâs do some of my famous back-of-the-napkin math on what this trust really costs.
The salesperson will slide a proposal across the table. Letâs call it a cool $500,000 for the initial license. A bargain! they'll say. But Penny Pincher knows better.
So, their "delightful" $500k solution has now metastasized into a True Total Cost of Ownership of $1.3 million for the first year alone. And thatâs before we even talk about the surprise "data egress fees" or the mandatory "premium enterprise-grade platinum-plated support" renewal that will increase by 40% next year just because they can.
I see their employees are quoted here. Itâs all very touching.
âI saw firsthand the transparent nature of our leadership team... it does not come at the expense of our people.â - Ava Thompson, Executive Support
Of course it doesn't come at the expense of your people, Ava. It comes at the expense of MY people's budget.
And Charles from FP&A, my counterpart. âI've been fortunate to see and drive change at the individual level.â Thatâs a lovely way of saying, âI spend my days trying to figure out how to re-categorize our cloud spend so the board doesn't realize this database costs more than our entire sales team.â
They claim their leaders are "building an environment where people feel empowered to take risks." The only risk I see is the one weâre taking with our companyâs solvency. They promise some astronomical ROI, a fantasy number conjured up in a spreadsheet. They say this will make us agile and innovative. But my napkin math shows that after paying for their ecosystem, we won't have enough money left to innovate on our office coffee, let alone our technology stack. This investment wonât deliver a 300% ROI; itâll deliver a 100% chance of me needing to update my resume.
They say they're not just building next-generation technology, but "building the next generation of leaders."
Let me be clear. Youâre not building leaders. Youâre building dependents, locked into your ecosystem, praying the renewal price doesnât double. Now if youâll excuse me, I have to go approve a budget for Post-it Notes and ballpoint pensâan investment with a clear, immediate, and understandable return.