đŸ”„ The DB Grill đŸ”„

Where database blog posts get flame-broiled to perfection

MySQL Router 8.4: How to Deal with Metadata Updates Overhead
Originally from percona.com/blog/feed/
August 21, 2025 ‱ Roasted by Jamie "Vendetta" Mitchell Read Original Article

Ah, here we go. It’s “surprising” that a brand-new, completely idle cluster is writing to its logs like a hyperactive day trader who’s just discovered caffeine and futures. Surprising to whom, exactly? The marketing department? The new hires who still believe the slide decks? Because I can promise you, it wasn’t surprising to anyone who sat in the Q3 planning meetings for "Project Cohesion" back in the day.

This write-up is a classic. It’s a beautifully crafted piece of technical archeology, trying to explain away a fundamental design choice that was made in a panic to meet a conference deadline. You see, when you bolt a state machine onto a system that was never designed for it and then decide the only way for it to know what its friends are doing is by screaming into the void every 500 milliseconds, you get what they politely call “a significant amount of writes.”

We called it "architectural scar tissue."

They say the effect became “much more spectacular after MySQL version 8.4.” Spectacular. That’s a word, alright. It’s the kind of word a project manager uses when the performance graphs look like an EKG during a heart attack. “The latency is
 spectacular!” It’s not a bug, you see, it’s just a very dramatic and unforeseen feature. A consequence of that next-generation group communication protocol we were all so excited about. The one that, under the hood, was basically a series of increasingly desperate shell scripts held together with duct tape and the vague hope that network latency would one day be solved by magic.

This whole article is a masterclass in corporate doublespeak. It’ll “explain why it happens and how to address it.” Let me translate.

I love the pretense that this is all some fascinating, emergent behavior of a complex system. It’s not. It’s the direct, predictable result of prioritizing a bullet point on a feature matrix over sound engineering. I seem to recall a few whiteboards covered in warnings about this exact kind of metadata churn. Those warnings were cheerfully erased to make room for the new marketing slogan. Something about “effortless scale” or “autonomous operation,” I think. Turns out “autonomous” just meant it would find new and creative ways to thrash your I/O all on its own, no user intervention required.

This effect became much more spectacular after MySQL version 8.4.

You have to admire the honesty, buried as it is. That’s the version where "Project Chimera" finally got merged—the one that stitched three different management tools together and called it a unified control plane. The result is a system that has to write to its own log to tell itself what it’s doing. It's the database equivalent of leaving sticky notes all over your own body to remember your name.

So, by all means, read the official explanation. Learn the proper incantations to make the cluster a little less chatty. But don’t for a second think this is just some quirky side effect. It’s the ghost of a thousand rushed stand-ups, a monument to the roadmap that a VP drew on a napkin.

It’s good they’re finally documenting it, I suppose. It’s brave, really. Almost as brave as putting it into production. Good luck with that. You’re gonna need it.