Where database blog posts get flame-broiled to perfection
Alright, hold my lukewarm coffee. I just read this little gem. "Build full-stack applications faster with the Kiro IDE using deep knowledge of your Supabase project."
Faster. That's always the word, isn't it? We're not building it more reliably, or more maintainably, or with observability that doesn't look like a child's finger painting. No, we're building it faster. Because the thing I love most is getting a frantic call about a poorly understood abstraction that's on fire, all so a developer could save ten minutes typing a SQL command.
And this "deep knowledge" claim is just... chef's kiss. Oh, your IDE has deep knowledge of my Supabase project? Wonderful. Does its deep knowledge include the emergency hotfix I pushed at 2 AM last Tuesday that bypassed the ORM entirely because it was generating insane queries? Does it know about the one weird, under-documented view that the analytics team depends on for their quarterly reports, and if it changes even slightly, the C-suite's dashboards all turn into N/A? No? Didn't think so. "Deep knowledge" is corporate jargon for "we parsed your schema.sql file and made some assumptions." And we all know what happens when you assume. You make an ass out of u and me and the entire production user database.
But let's get to my favorite part. The real reason my pager battery life is measured in hours, not days.
best practices for database migrations
I have to laugh. I really do. I've seen the demos. The "best practice" migration is always adding a last_name column to a users table with 12 rows in it. Wow, revolutionary. It took 14 milliseconds. Give the man a Nobel Prize.
Here's what that "best practice" looks like in the real world. It's 3:15 AM on the Saturday of a long holiday weekend. Your "intelligent" IDE has decided the best way to add a non-nullable field with a default value to our 800-gigabyte user_events table is with a single ALTER TABLE command. It confidently tells you, "Don't worry, I'll handle the locks." The migration starts. The lock is acquired. And then it just⦠sits there. For ten minutes. Then twenty. The application grinds to a halt because every single INSERT is now queued up behind this genius, "best practice" migration. The monitoring alerts start firing, but what monitoring? We spent the budget on the magic IDE that was supposed to prevent this! The one dashboard we have is probably just a link to the vendor's "System Status: All Green!" page.
My phone starts vibrating off the nightstand. It's the junior dev, bless his heart. "Alex, the migration script Kiro generated is... uh... it's been running for 45 minutes. The site is down. The progress bar is gone. What do I do?"
And I'll be sitting here, staring at my laptop lid, which is covered in the ghosts of solutions past. I've got my Parse sticker right next to my RethinkDB sticker, which is peeling a bit but still holding on, just like their lingering technical debt in a few of our legacy services. I'm already making room for a shiny new Kiro sticker.
So please, tell me more about your edge functions and your security policies. I'm sure an IDE's "deep knowledge" is perfectly capable of writing flawless, context-aware RLS policies that don't accidentally expose every user's PII via a poorly-configured view. That has never happened before.
Go on, build it faster. I'll be here, brewing the coffee, updating my rollback scripts, and waiting for the inevitable. The call will come. It always does. And your "best practice" will be my "incident report."